ABSTRACT
Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder leading to variable degrees of skeletal muscle weakness. During pregnancy, infections can trigger exacerbations and should be treated promptly and aggressively.(1) Sotrovimab is a monoclonal antibody used as monotherapy in high-risk, symptomatic non-hospitalized patients at risk of developing COVID-19 disease. (2) It is thought to have retained activity against SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant. (3) Limited data are available on its use in pregnancy. Case: A 39-year-old woman with severe generalized MG, was referred to our joint neuro-obstetric multidisciplinary service. Her two previous pregnancies were complicated by severe exacerbations of MG necessitating intensive care admissions, and preterm labour. Her long-term therapy included high dose steroids, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and plasma exchanges. In this pregnancy, she additionally received rituximab in the first-trimester, allowing her prednisolone to be weaned to 20 mg daily, with ongoing 3-weekly IVIG. She received 3 doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. At 19 weeks she developed mild coryzal symptoms, sore throat and myalgia. Lateral flow and polymerase chain reaction tests in the community confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. She was treated with sotrovimab with uneventful recovery at home. At 31 weeks, she again tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, after reporting mild COVID-19 symptoms. She received a second dose of sotrovimab and had a quick recovery. Subsequent SARS-CoV-2 genotyping indicated she had contracted the Omicron-BA.2 variant. Fetal surveillance for growth (SARS-CoV-2) and arthrogryposis (MG) did not raise concerns. At 35+3 weeks, she went into spontaneous labour and was delivered by caesarean section for evolving chorioamnionitis, with uneventful recovery for mother and baby. Discussion(s): We report a case of repeated treatment with sotrovimab (in second and third trimesters) of a high-risk, non-hospitalized pregnant woman, who was re-infected with SARS-CoV-2. We identified no immediate maternal, fetal or neonatal complications following two doses of sotrovimab for mild COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Financial adversity in times of economic recession have been shown to have an unequal effect on individuals with prior mental health problems. This study investigated the relationship between mental health groupings across the adult life-course and change in financial situation and employment status during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the use of financial measures to mitigate the economic shock. METHODS: Using two nationally representative British birth cohorts, the National Child Development Study (1958) n = 17,415 and 1970 British Cohort Study n = 17,198, we identified 5 different life-course trajectories of psychological distress from adolescence to midlife which were similar but not identical across the two cohorts. We explored their relation to changes in financial and employment circumstances at different stages during the pandemic from May 2020 to March 2021, applying multinomial logistic regression and controlling for numerous early life covariates, including family socio-economic status (SES). In addition, we ran modified Poisson models with robust standard errors to identify whether different mental health trajectories were supported by government and used other methods to mitigate their financial situation. RESULTS: We found that the financial circumstances of pre-pandemic trajectories of psychological distress with differential onset, severity, and chronicity across the life-course were exacerbated by the COVID-19 economic shock. The 'stable-high' (persistent severe symptoms) and 'adult-onset' (symptoms developing in 30s, but later decreasing) groups were vulnerable to job loss. Compared to pre-pandemic trajectory groupings with no, minor, or psychological distress symptoms in early adulthood, the 'stable-high', 'midlife-onset' (symptoms developing in midlife), and 'adult-onset' trajectory groups were more likely to seek support from the UK governments economic response package. However, trajectories with pre-pandemic psychological distress were also at greater risk of reducing consumption, dis-saving, relying on increased financial help from family and friends, and also taking payment holidays (agreements with lenders to pause mortgage, credit card or loan payments for a set period) and borrowing. CONCLUSION: This work highlights different trajectories of pre-pandemic psychological distress, compared to groups with no symptoms were more vulnerable to pandemic-related economic shock and job loss. By adopting unsustainable mitigating measures (borrowing and payment holidays) to support their financial circumstances during COVID-19, these mental health trajectories are at even more risk of lasting adverse impacts and future economic difficulties.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychological Distress , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Birth Cohort , Cohort Studies , PandemicsABSTRACT
Evidence suggests that potential health complications after COVID-19 illness might require ongoing clinical care. After discharge from an initial COVID-19 hospitalization, 9% of patients were readmitted to the same hospital within 2 months of discharge. Multiple readmissions occurred in 1.6% of patients. Risk factors for readmission included age =65 years, presence of certain chronic conditions, hospitalization within the 3 months preceding the first COVID-19 hospitalization, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility or with home health care. Understanding frequency of, and potential reasons for, readmission after a COVID-19 hospitalization can inform clinical practice, discharge disposition decisions, and public health priorities, such as health care resource planning.
ABSTRACT
What is already known about this topic? Obesity increases the risk for severe COVID-19-associated illness. What is added by this report? Among 148,494 U.S. adults with COVID-19, a nonlinear relationship was found between body mass index (BMI) and COVID-19 severity, with lowest risks at BMIs near the threshold between healthy weight and overweight in most instances, then increasing with higher BMI. Overweight and obesity were risk factors for invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity was a risk factor for hospitalization and death, particularly among adults aged <65 years. What are the implications for public health practice? These findings highlight clinical and public health implications of higher BMIs, including the need for intensive management of COVID-19-associated illness, continued vaccine prioritization and masking, and policies to support healthy behaviors.